Washington Job Protection Agreement Of May 1936

Going back to the history of railway work, we find that in the late 1800s, railway workers were engaged in fierce struggles for agreements that would prevent the railways from acting arbitrarily and whimsically. The workers tried to abolish patronage in the task and eventually established the principle of seniority in the railway industry. To protect craft rights, employees also fought for and obtained a scope rule. Today`s railway workers have a responsibility to preserve these principles. For example, when a carrier violates the rules of service or scope, railway workers are required to file a time fee not for the purpose of increasing the compensation of owners, but to assert their contractual rights. And the penalty should be severe enough to make it unprofitable for the wearer to repeat the injury. In the debate about the management of cases of maladministration, it is important to recognize that there are different types of complaints. As a general rule, any complaint from members about wage rates, rules and working conditions is generally referred to as a complaint. Any claim resulting from the application of specific provisions of the collective agreement is generally dealt with by the time application procedure imposed on your land by the contract or the practice of the work plan in force on your basic employment contract or on the duration of your employment contract. Complaints arising from the provisions of the Act, such as the Hours of Service Act or the Interstate Commerce Act, are also complaints, but must be dealt with in a different way, simply because their basis lies in the legislation, not the collective agreement. In most cases, these types of complaints must be implemented by the relevant regulatory authority and remain outside the scope of time request procedures and adjudication under the Railway Works Act. The duties of a local president are great. Members often do not understand the duties of the local chief.

Many of our members believe that it is the local president and not the member responsible for developing information on offences. In some cases, local presidents will need to be involved in the investigation process. However, this does not exempt the applicant from keeping as much information as possible about an alleged breach of contract. The complainant is in a much better position to know the relevant facts regarding the offences in which they are personally involved. You, not the local president, will win money if the union successfully defends its claims. We all have to work together. If the Chair proceeds with the infringement without sufficient data on an arbitration procedure, there is no doubt that he receives a decision of refusal. If the refusal award is only for a claim or a complaint, the situation would not be so serious. However, in most cases, a refusal could result in the loss of an important clause in the collective agreement.

If this provision were part of a system agreement, it could have negative consequences for members who work on the railways under the treaty. If it is a provision within the framework of a national agreement, it could have a negative impact on our membership as a whole, provided that the national agreement is no longer concluded. The collective agreement covers much more than the book of printed contracts. Many documents apply to members` salary rates, rules and working conditions.